The los angeles sparks vs indiana fever match player stats matchup delivered plenty of excitement, featuring standout performances from some of the WNBA’s biggest stars. Indiana secured an 87-78 victory behind an impressive all-around display from Caitlin Clark, who finished with 24 points and 9 assists, while Kelsey Mitchell added 23 points to fuel the Fever offense.
Game Summary and Final Score
Final Score: Indiana Fever 87, Los Angeles Sparks 78 (Indiana improved to 1-1; Los Angeles fell to 0-2)
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
| Quarter | Indiana Fever | Los Angeles Sparks | Running Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 24 | 20 | IND 24-20 |
| Q2 | 24 | 14 | IND 48-34 |
| Q3 | 20 | 18 | IND 68-52 |
| Q4 | 19 | 26 | IND 87-78 |
| Final | 87 | 78 | Fever win |
Key Moments and Narrative Recap
The Indiana Fever controlled the game from the opening tip, led by Caitlin Clark’s early scoring and playmaking. They built a solid 24-20 lead after the first quarter and then exploded in the second, outscoring the Sparks 24-14 to take a commanding 48-34 halftime advantage. Indiana’s defense was particularly effective in limiting Los Angeles to just 14 points in the second period.
Indiana Fever Player Stats
Full Box Score
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin Clark | 35 | 24 | 9-18 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 0 |
| Kelsey Mitchell | 33 | 23 | 8-16 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Aliyah Boston | 31 | 14 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| NaLyssa Smith | 28 | 9 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Erica Wheeler | 29 | 8 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Lexie Hull | 20 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Temi Fagbenle | 16 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Bench Unit | — | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Top Performers of the Game
Caitlin Clark
Clark once again proved why she is one of the league’s most dynamic guards. She finished with 24 points, 9 assists, and 6 rebounds while knocking down four three-pointers. Her ability to create scoring opportunities for both herself and her teammates was a major reason Indiana controlled the game’s tempo.
Kelsey Mitchell
Mitchell provided elite scoring support with 23 points on efficient shooting. She consistently stretched the Sparks’ defense with her perimeter threat and delivered several timely baskets whenever Los Angeles attempted to cut into the lead. Her scoring punch complemented Clark perfectly throughout the contest.
Aliyah Boston
Boston dominated the paint with a double-double performance of 14 points and 10 rebounds. She anchored Indiana’s interior defense, protected the rim, and provided reliable scoring around the basket. Her physical presence helped the Fever win key rebounding battles.
Bench Contributions
Indiana’s bench may not have produced eye-catching scoring numbers, but its impact went beyond the stat sheet. The reserve unit provided valuable energy, defensive intensity, and rebounding support whenever the starters rested.
Los Angeles Sparks Player Stats
Full Box Score
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelsey Plum | 36 | 26 | 10-21 | 4-10 | 2-2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| Dearica Hamby | 34 | 18 | 7-14 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Cameron Brink | 29 | 12 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Azurá Stevens | 31 | 9 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lexie Brown | 28 | 7 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Rae Burrell | 18 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Aari McDonald | 15 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Bench Unit | — | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Top Performers of the Game
Kelsey Plum
Plum carried much of the Sparks’ offensive workload, finishing with a game-high 26 points while adding six assists. She attacked the basket aggressively, knocked down key perimeter shots, and repeatedly created scoring opportunities against Indiana’s defense.
Dearica Hamby
Hamby delivered another impressive all-around performance with 18 points and 9 rebounds. Her versatility allowed her to contribute both inside and on the perimeter, and she consistently provided energy on both ends of the floor.
Cameron Brink
Brink showcased her two-way potential by recording 12 points, 8 rebounds, and 3 blocks. Her rim protection altered several Indiana possessions, while her activity on the glass helped the Sparks stay close in the rebounding battle. Brink’s defensive presence was one of the brightest spots for Los Angeles despite the defeat.
Bench Contributions
The Sparks received limited scoring from their bench, which became a key factor in the final result. While the reserve unit brought energy and defensive effort, Los Angeles struggled to generate consistent offense whenever the starters rested.
Advanced Team & Player Stats
Team Advanced Statistics
| Stat | Indiana Fever | Los Angeles Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 87 | 78 |
| Field Goal % | 48.6% | 43.8% |
| Three-Point % | 38.7% | 31.4% |
| Free Throw % | 84.2% | 72.7% |
| Effective FG % | 54.8% | 48.3% |
| Total Rebounds | 39 | 35 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 10 | 8 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 29 | 27 |
| Assists | 25 | 18 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 15 |
| Steals | 8 | 6 |
| Blocks | 3 | 5 |
| Fast-Break Points | 14 | 9 |
| Points in the Paint | 38 | 34 |
| Bench Points | 9 | 6 |
| Estimated Pace | 79.5 | 79.5 |
Shooting Efficiency Analysis
The Fever were significantly more efficient offensively throughout the game. Their 48.6% field-goal percentage and 38.7% shooting from beyond the arc allowed them to maximize possessions and maintain scoring consistency.
Rebounding Breakdown
| Rebounding Category | Indiana Fever | Los Angeles Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Offensive Rebounds | 10 | 8 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 29 | 27 |
| Total Rebounds | 39 | 35 |
| Second-Chance Points | 12 | 8 |
Ball Security and Playmaking
| Category | Indiana Fever | Los Angeles Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Assists | 25 | 18 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 15 |
| Assist-to-Turnover Ratio | 2.27 | 1.20 |
Indiana’s offense flowed through Caitlin Clark’s playmaking, resulting in a strong assist total and efficient ball movement.
Top Player Advanced Metrics
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3PT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin Clark | 24 | 6 | 9 | 50.0% | 44.4% |
| Kelsey Mitchell | 23 | 3 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Aliyah Boston | 14 | 10 | 3 | 60.0% | — |
| Kelsey Plum | 26 | 4 | 6 | 47.6% | 40.0% |
| Dearica Hamby | 18 | 9 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Cameron Brink | 12 | 8 | 2 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Head-to-Head Comparison: Fever vs Sparks
| Category | Advantage |
|---|---|
| Total Points | Indiana Fever |
| Field Goal Percentage | Indiana Fever |
| Three-Point Shooting | Indiana Fever |
| Free Throw Shooting | Indiana Fever |
| Rebounding | Indiana Fever |
| Assists | Indiana Fever |
| Turnover Control | Indiana Fever |
| Rim Protection | Los Angeles Sparks |
| Star Scoring Performance | Los Angeles Sparks (Plum) |
| Team Offensive Balance | Indiana Fever |
| Bench Production | Indiana Fever |
Key Matchup Insights & Analysis
The matchup between the Indiana Fever and Los Angeles Sparks was defined by Indiana’s offensive efficiency, superior ball movement, and the outstanding play of Caitlin Clark. While the Sparks received strong individual performances from Kelsey Plum and Dearica Hamby, the Fever’s balanced attack and ability to control key possessions ultimately determined the outcome.
Caitlin Clark Performance Deep Dive
Caitlin Clark delivered one of the most influential performances of the game, finishing with 24 points, 9 assists, and 6 rebounds while shooting efficiently from the field and beyond the arc.
What Made Clark Effective?
Elite Playmaking
- Clark consistently manipulated the defense with her court vision.
- Her 9 assists created numerous open looks for teammates.
- Indiana’s offense flowed through her decision-making in transition and half-court sets.
Three-Point Threat
- Clark’s perimeter shooting forced defenders to extend well beyond the three-point line.
- This opened driving lanes for teammates and created spacing advantages throughout the game.
Third-Quarter Control
- The game’s defining stretch came during the third quarter when Clark orchestrated a crucial Fever scoring run.
- She combined scoring and playmaking to help Indiana build a lead that Los Angeles never fully erased.
Leadership Under Pressure
- Whenever the Sparks made a push, Clark responded with a timely basket or assist.
- Her ability to remain composed prevented momentum from swinging completely in Los Angeles’ favor.
Caitlin Clark vs. Sparks Backcourt
| Category | Caitlin Clark | Sparks Guards |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 24 | 33 Combined |
| Assists | 9 | 10 Combined |
| Three-Pointers | 4 | 5 Combined |
| Turnover Impact | Low | Higher Team Total |
| Offensive Control | Excellent | Inconsistent |
Betting & Player Props Recap
For bettors, the Indiana Fever’s 87-78 win produced mixed results depending on which sportsbook and line was used. Most books listed Indiana as a slight favorite between -1.5 and -8.5 points, while totals were generally posted in the 184.5–185.5 range.
Main Betting Results
| Market | Closing Line* | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Moneyline | Fever -120 to -132 | Win |
| Spread | Fever -1.5 | Covered |
| Total Points | 184.5–185.5 | Under (165 Points) |
| Final Score | Fever 87, Sparks 78 | 165 Total |
















Leave a Reply